D 2024-02-15 01:17:05.205472+00:00 Params: [('source_key', 'agdicmlk...'), ('last_polled', '2024-02-14-05-41-55')]
I 2024-02-15 01:17:05.249300+00:00 Source: HaoZeke (GitHub) HaoZeke, https://brid.gy/github/HaoZeke
I 2024-02-15 01:17:05.249718+00:00 Last poll: https://brid.gy/log?start_time=1707959684&key=agdicmlkLWd5chMLEgZHaXRIdWIiB0hhb1pla2UM
I 2024-02-15 01:17:05.287369+00:00 Updating HaoZeke (GitHub) /github/HaoZeke : {'poll_status': 'polling', 'last_poll_attempt': datetime.datetime(2024, 2, 15, 1, 17, 5, 249817, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'rate_limited': False}
D 2024-02-15 01:17:05.408810+00:00 Using ETag Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:53:25 GMT, last activity id zotero:translators:3116
I 2024-02-15 01:17:05.436833+00:00 no refresh_token
I 2024-02-15 01:17:05.437747+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/notifications?all=true&participating=true&per_page=10 {'headers': {'If-Modified-Since': '...', 'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:06.641781+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:06.642253+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843 {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:07.406693+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:07.448325+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/76 {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:07.821880+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:07.824593+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315 {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:08.274395+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:08.277325+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/73 {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:09.155429+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:09.158992+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843/comments?since=2024-02-13T21:53:25Z {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:10.136314+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:10.141718+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843/reactions {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:11.239997+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:11.245369+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/76/comments?since=2024-02-13T21:53:25Z {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:12.752514+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:12.763159+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/76/reactions {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:13.532797+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:13.535228+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315/comments?since=2024-02-13T21:53:25Z {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:14.160221+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:14.165122+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315/reactions {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:14.797945+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:14.800183+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/73/comments?since=2024-02-13T21:53:25Z {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.234125+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.262205+00:00 requests.get https://api.github.com/repos/ReScience/submissions/issues/73/reactions {'headers': {'Authorization': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.835704+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.846235+00:00 Found 4 public activities: dict_keys(['tag:github.com,2013:openjournals:joss-reviews:5843', 'tag:github.com,2013:ReScience:submissions:76', 'tag:github.com,2013:openjournals:joss-reviews:6315', 'tag:github.com,2013:ReScience:submissions:73'])
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.846503+00:00 Found 0 private activities: dict_keys([])
D 2024-02-15 01:17:15.847836+00:00 discovering original posts for: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843
W 2024-02-15 01:17:15.848721+00:00 Found 13 original post candidates, only resolving redirects for the first 10
I 2024-02-15 01:17:15.848883+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:16.423121+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:16.439852+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review
I 2024-02-15 01:17:16.534449+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/TeX {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:17.464640+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:17.467346+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/TeX: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/TeX
I 2024-02-15 01:17:17.468248+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Shell {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:18.076981+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:18.077266+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Shell: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Shell
I 2024-02-15 01:17:18.077503+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Python {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:18.537057+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:18.537597+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Python: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Python
I 2024-02-15 01:17:18.537855+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%207%20%28CSISM%29 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:19.283374+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:19.283656+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%207%20%28CSISM%29: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%207%20%28CSISM%29
I 2024-02-15 01:17:19.283906+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/just {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:19.742403+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:19.742757+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/just: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/just
I 2024-02-15 01:17:19.743702+00:00 requests.head http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-5199 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:20.368047+00:00 Redirected to https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-5199
I 2024-02-15 01:17:20.368520+00:00 Received 200
D 2024-02-15 01:17:20.371103+00:00 Resolved http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-5199 to https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-5199
I 2024-02-15 01:17:20.372144+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/fluid-Dynamics-Group/distribute {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:21.124779+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:21.125238+00:00 requests.head https://joss.theoj.org/papers/608f26973efcc9ba811327147443fa83/status.svg {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:21.915234+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:21.915598+00:00 requests.head https://joss.theoj.org/papers/608f26973efcc9ba811327147443fa83 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:22.348031+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:22.349072+00:00 Original post discovery found original posts set(), mentions {'https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%207%20%28CSISM%29', 'https://joss.theoj.org/papers/608f26973efcc9ba811327147443fa83/status.svg', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843#issuecomment-1734576082', 'https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-5199', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/TeX', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/just', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843#issuecomment-1731736862', 'https://joss.theoj.org/papers/608f26973efcc9ba811327147443fa83', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Shell', 'https://github.com/fluid-Dynamics-Group/distribute', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Python', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review'}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:22.349648+00:00 13 mentions, pruning down to 10
I 2024-02-15 01:17:22.349916+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843#issuecomment-1731736862 {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:23.323501+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:23.324211+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843#issuecomment-1734576082 {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:23.645120+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:23.646164+00:00 requests.head https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:24.472816+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:24.474999+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843 {'headers': None}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:24.854933+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:24.855273+00:00 starting posse post discovery with syndicated https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5843
D 2024-02-15 01:17:25.428975+00:00 discovering original posts for: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/76
I 2024-02-15 01:17:25.430030+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/DOM%3A%20Machine%20Learning {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:25.801488+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:25.802118+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/DOM%3A%20Machine%20Learning: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/DOM%3A%20Machine%20Learning
I 2024-02-15 01:17:25.802348+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/LANG%3A%20Python {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:26.425844+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:26.426122+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/LANG%3A%20Python: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/LANG%3A%20Python
I 2024-02-15 01:17:26.426389+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/TYPE%3A%20Replication {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:27.550712+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:27.551583+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/TYPE%3A%20Replication: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/TYPE%3A%20Replication
I 2024-02-15 01:17:27.551951+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/01%20-%20Request {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:27.970034+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:27.970316+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/01%20-%20Request: https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/01%20-%20Request
I 2024-02-15 01:17:27.970545+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/blob/main/report.pdf {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:28.280100+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:28.281818+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/blob/main/report.metadata.tex {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:28.629905+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:28.630280+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/tree/main {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:29.164489+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:29.165139+00:00 Original post discovery found original posts set(), mentions {'https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/blob/main/report.metadata.tex', 'https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/LANG%3A%20Python', 'https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/TYPE%3A%20Replication', 'https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/01%20-%20Request', 'https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/tree/main', 'https://github.com/ADevillers/SimCLR/blob/main/report.pdf', 'https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/labels/DOM%3A%20Machine%20Learning'}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:29.166523+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/76 {'headers': None}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:29.832695+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:29.833019+00:00 starting posse post discovery with syndicated https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/76
D 2024-02-15 01:17:30.084457+00:00 discovering original posts for: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315
I 2024-02-15 01:17:30.090232+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%203%20%28PE%29 {'headers': {}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:31.034122+00:00 Received 404
W 2024-02-15 01:17:31.034428+00:00 Couldn't resolve URL https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%203%20%28PE%29: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%203%20%28PE%29
I 2024-02-15 01:17:31.034668+00:00 requests.head http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:32.143823+00:00 Redirected to https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833
I 2024-02-15 01:17:32.144272+00:00 Received 200
D 2024-02-15 01:17:32.144375+00:00 Resolved http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833 to https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833
I 2024-02-15 01:17:32.144576+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:33.293671+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:33.296489+00:00 requests.head https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686/status.svg {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:33.915295+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:33.915683+00:00 requests.head https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:34.397198+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:34.397597+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315#issuecomment-1935646506 {'headers': {'User-Agent': '...'}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:35.421852+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:35.445016+00:00 Original post discovery found original posts set(), mentions {'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315#issuecomment-1935646506', 'https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html', 'https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2', 'https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686/status.svg', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/TeX', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Track%3A%203%20%28PE%29', 'https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833', 'https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/Python', 'https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review'}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:35.452787+00:00 requests.head https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315 {'headers': None}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:35.913790+00:00 Received 200
I 2024-02-15 01:17:35.914148+00:00 starting posse post discovery with syndicated https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315
D 2024-02-15 01:17:36.243353+00:00 activity[content] ## Review checklist for @sidihamady

### Conflict of interest

- [x] I confirm that I have read the [JOSS conflict of interest (COI) policy](https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/COI.md) and that: I have no COIs with reviewing this work or that any perceived COIs have been waived by JOSS for the purpose of this review.

### Code ... Conduct

- [x] I confirm that I read and will adhere to the [JOSS code ... conduct](https://joss.theoj.org/about#code_of_conduct)..

### General checks

- [x] **Repository:** Is the source code ... this software available at the [https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2](https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2)??
- [x] **License:** Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE or COPYING file with the contents of an [OSI approved](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) software license?
- [ ] **Contribution and authorship:** Has the submitting author (@ldes89150) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?
- [ ] **Substantial scholarly effort:** Does this submission meet the scope eligibility described in the [JOSS guidelines](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort)
- [ ] **Data sharing:** If the paper contains original data, data are accessible to the reviewers. If the paper contains no original data, please check this item.
- [ ] **Reproducibility:** If the paper contains original results, results are entirely reproducible by reviewers. If the paper contains no original results, please check this item.
- [ ] **Human and animal research:** If the paper contains original data research on humans subjects or animals, does it comply with [JOSS's human participants research policy and/or animal research policy](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/policies.html?highlight=animal#joss-policies)?? If the paper contains no such data, please check this item.

### Functionality

- [ ] **Installation:** Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?
- [ ] **Functionality:** Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
- [ ] **Performance:** If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)

### Documentation

- [ ] **A statement of need**: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
- [ ] **Installation instructions:** Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.
- [ ] **Example usage:** Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).
- [ ] **Functionality documentation:** Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?
- [ ] **Automated tests:** Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the functionality of the software can be verified?
- [ ] **Community guidelines:** Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support

### Software paper

- [ ] **Summary:** Has a clear description of the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience been provided?
- [ ] **A statement of need:** Does the paper have a section titled 'Statement of need' that clearly states what problems the software is designed to solve, who the target audience is, and its relation to other work?
- [ ] **State of the field:** Do the authors describe how this software compares to other commonly-used packages?
- [ ] **Quality of writing:** Is the paper well written (i.e., it does not require editing for structure, language, or writing quality)?
- [ ] **References:** Is the list of references complete, and is everything cited appropriately that should be cited (e.g., papers, datasets, software)? Do references in the text use the proper [citation syntax](https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#extension-citations)??
=> ## Review checklist for @sidihamady

### Conflict of interest

- [x] I confirm that I have read the [JOSS conflict of interest (COI) policy](https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/COI.md) and that: I have no COIs with reviewing this work or that any perceived COIs have been waived by JOSS for the purpose of this review.

### Code ... Conduct

- [x] I confirm that I read and will adhere to the [JOSS code ... conduct](https://joss.theoj.org/about#code_of_conduct)..

### General checks

- [x] **Repository:** Is the source code ... this software available at the [https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2](https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2)??
- [x] **License:** Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE or COPYING file with the contents of an [OSI approved](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) software license?
- [ ] **Contribution and authorship:** Has the submitting author (@ldes89150) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?
- [ ] **Substantial scholarly effort:** Does this submission meet the scope eligibility described in the [JOSS guidelines](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort)
- [x] **Data sharing:** If the paper contains original data, data are accessible to the reviewers. If the paper contains no original data, please check this item.
- [x] **Reproducibility:** If the paper contains original results, results are entirely reproducible by reviewers. If the paper contains no original results, please check this item.
- [x] **Human and animal research:** If the paper contains original data research on humans subjects or animals, does it comply with [JOSS's human participants research policy and/or animal research policy](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/policies.html?highlight=animal#joss-policies)?? If the paper contains no such data, please check this item.

### Functionality

- [x] **Installation:** Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?
- [x] **Functionality:** Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
- [ ] **Performance:** If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)

### Documentation

- [x] **A statement of need**: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
- [x] **Installation instructions:** Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.
- [x] **Example usage:** Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).
- [x] **Functionality documentation:** Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?
- [ ] **Automated tests:** Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the functionality of the software can be verified?
- [ ] **Community guidelines:** Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support

### Software paper

- [ ] **Summary:** Has a clear description of the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience been provided?
- [ ] **A statement of need:** Does the paper have a section titled 'Statement of need' that clearly states what problems the software is designed to solve, who the target audience is, and its relation to other work?
- [ ] **State of the field:** Do the authors describe how this software compares to other commonly-used packages?
- [ ] **Quality of writing:** Is the paper well written (i.e., it does not require editing for structure, language, or writing quality)?
- [ ] **References:** Is the list of references complete, and is everything cited appropriately that should be cited (e.g., papers, datasets, software)? Do references in the text use the proper [citation syntax](https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#extension-citations)??

I 2024-02-15 01:17:36.243851+00:00 Response changed! Re-propagating. Original: Response(key=Key('Response', 'tag:github.com,2013:openjournals:joss-reviews:IC_kwDOAx6EUs5zX58q'), activities_json=['{"id":"tag:github.com,2013:openjournals:joss-reviews:6315","url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315","content":"**Submitting author:** @ldes89150 (<a href=\\"http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-6833\\">Chung-You Shih</a>)\\n**Repository:** https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2<;!--end-target-repository-->\\n**Branch with paper.md** (empty if default branch): paper\\n**Version:** v0.1.0\\n**Editor:** @HaoZeke\\n**Reviewers:** @brandondube, @sidihamady, @ktahar, @wavefrontshaping\\n**Archive:** Pending\\n\\n## Status\\n\\n[![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686)\\n\\nStatus badge code:... <a href=\\"https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686\\"><img src=\\"https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686/status.svg\\"></a>\\nMarkdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70246ad674d3806798e343f6ecffa686)\\n```\\n**Reviewers and authors**:\\n\\nPlease avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the <a href=\\"https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2\\" target=\\"_blank\\">target repository</a> and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)\\n\\n## Reviewer instructions & questions\\n\\n@brandondube & @sidihamady & @ktahar & @wavefrontshaping, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.\\nFirst of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:\\n\\n```\\n@editorialbot generate my checklist\\n```\\n\\nThe reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @HaoZeke know.\\n\\n\\u2728 **Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest** \\u2728 \\n\\n\\n## Checklists\\n\\n\\n\\n\\ud83d\\udcdd [Checklist for @sidihamady](https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315#issuecomment-1935646506)\\n\\n\\n"}'], created=DatetimeWithNanoseconds(2024, 2, 10, 2, 32, 22, 328434, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), error=[], failed=[], leased_until=None, old_response_jsons=[], original_posts=[], response_json='{"id":"tag:github.com,2013:openjournals:joss-reviews:IC_kwDOAx6EUs5zX58q","url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315#issuecomment-1935646506","author":{"id":"tag:github.com,2013:MDQ6VXNlcjQzMDI4NDcw","url":"https://github.com/sidihamady","displayName":"sidihamady","objectType":"person","username":"sidihamady","image":{"url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/43028470?v=4"}},"content":"## Review checklist for @sidihamady\\n\\n### Conflict of interest\\n\\n- [x] I confirm that I have read the [JOSS conflict of interest (COI) policy](https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/COI.md) and that: I have no COIs with reviewing this work or that any perceived COIs have been waived by JOSS for the purpose of this review.\\n\\n### Code ... Conduct\\n\\n- [x] I confirm that I read and will adhere to the [JOSS code ... conduct](https://joss.theoj.org/about#code_of_conduct)..\\n\\n### General checks\\n\\n- [x] **Repository:** Is the source code ... this software available at the [https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2](https://github.com/QITI/pySLM2)??\\n- [x] **License:** Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE or COPYING file with the contents of an [OSI approved](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) software license?\\n- [ ] **Contribution and authorship:** Has the submitting author (@ldes89150) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?\\n- [ ] **Substantial scholarly effort:** Does this submission meet the scope eligibility described in the [JOSS guidelines](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort)\\n- [ ] **Data sharing:** If the paper contains original data, data are accessible to the reviewers. If the paper contains no original data, please check this item.\\n- [ ] **Reproducibility:** If the paper contains original results, results are entirely reproducible by reviewers. If the paper contains no original results, please check this item.\\n- [ ] **Human and animal research:** If the paper contains original data research on humans subjects or animals, does it comply with [JOSS\'s human participants research policy and/or animal research policy](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/policies.html?highlight=animal#joss-policies)?? If the paper contains no such data, please check this item.\\n\\n\\n### Functionality\\n\\n- [ ] **Installation:** Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?\\n- [ ] **Functionality:** Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?\\n- [ ] **Performance:** If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)\\n\\n### Documentation\\n\\n- [ ] **A statement of need**: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?\\n- [ ] **Installation instructions:** Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.\\n- [ ] **Example usage:** Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).\\n- [ ] **Functionality documentation:** Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?\\n- [ ] **Automated tests:** Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the functionality of the software can be verified?\\n- [ ] **Community guidelines:** Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support\\n\\n### Software paper\\n\\n- [ ] **Summary:** Has a clear description of the high-level functionality and purpose of the software for a diverse, non-specialist audience been provided?\\n- [ ] **A statement of need:** Does the paper have a section titled \'Statement of need\' that clearly states what problems the software is designed to solve, who the target audience is, and its relation to other work?\\n- [ ] **State of the field:** Do the authors describe how this software compares to other commonly-used packages?\\n- [ ] **Quality of writing:** Is the paper well written (i.e., it does not require editing for structure, language, or writing quality)?\\n- [ ] **References:** Is the list of references complete, and is everything cited appropriately that should be cited (e.g., papers, datasets, software)? Do references in the text use the proper [citation syntax](https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#extension-citations)??\\n","published":"2024-02-09T10:07:10+00:00","updated":"2024-02-09T10:09:42+00:00","objectType":"comment","inReplyTo":[{"url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6315"}]}', sent=[], skipped=[], source=Key('GitHub', 'HaoZeke'), status='complete', type='comment', unsent=[], updated=datetime.datetime(2024, 2, 15, 1, 17, 36, 92705, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), urls_to_activity=None)
I 2024-02-15 01:17:36.541668+00:00 Added propagate task projects/brid-gy/locations/us-central1/queues/propagate/tasks/84322581493532302001 with ETA None: {'app_engine_http_request': {'http_method': 'POST', 'relative_uri': '/_ah/queue/propagate', 'body': b'response_key=agdicmlkLWd5ck8LEghSZXNwb25zZSJBdGFnOmdpdGh1Yi5jb20sMjAxMzpvcGVuam91cm5hbHM6am9zcy1yZXZpZXdzOklDX2t3RE9BeDZFVXM1elg1OHEM', 'headers': {'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'}}}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:36.714794+00:00 skipping refetch h-feed. last-syndication-url None, last-refetch 1970-01-01 00:00:00+00:00
I 2024-02-15 01:17:36.743103+00:00 Updating HaoZeke (GitHub) /github/HaoZeke : {'recent_private_posts': 0, 'last_polled': datetime.datetime(2024, 2, 15, 1, 17, 5, 249817, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'poll_status': 'ok', 'last_activities_etag': 'Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:57:23 GMT'}
I 2024-02-15 01:17:36.913855+00:00 Added poll task projects/brid-gy/locations/us-central1/queues/poll/tasks/56145841882191055661 with ETA 1708049491: {'app_engine_http_request': {'http_method': 'POST', 'relative_uri': '/_ah/queue/poll', 'body': b'source_key=agdicmlkLWd5chMLEgZHaXRIdWIiB0hhb1pla2UM&last_polled=2024-02-15-01-17-05', 'headers': {'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'}}, 'schedule_time': seconds: 1708049491
}